tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post4344806422920370848..comments2023-12-20T19:30:28.788-05:00Comments on Fixing Psychology: Unifying Psychology: On framing a positive messageEric Charleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17412168482569793996noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-40142546708656324352012-10-12T04:28:21.843-04:002012-10-12T04:28:21.843-04:00I'll look forward to seeing this paper; I have...I'll look forward to seeing this paper; I have to say I wasn't that impressed by the details of the approach, it was missing a lot (dynamics, action, etc) so it'll be interesting to see what they say here.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16732977871048876430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-2980619531189851072012-10-11T16:55:43.102-04:002012-10-11T16:55:43.102-04:00I liked their paper a lot.
I think the reference...I liked their paper a lot. <br /><br />I think the referenced argument (<a href="http://mancpsychsoc.blogspot.com/2012/03/does-psychology-need-revolution.html" rel="nofollow">found at the end of the nice PCT article found here</a>)was a pretty good example of what I am trying to avoid. So far as I can tell, the core idea in PCT is also a core idea in Eco Psych. There are different supplemental Eric Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17412168482569793996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-82897770403046617322012-10-11T15:57:55.156-04:002012-10-11T15:57:55.156-04:00I probably shouldn't have even used the term &...I probably shouldn't have even used the term "novel"... I mean novel in the sense of "things not known before" rather than "things <i>your</i> inferior system never could have found". I think there is pretty unanimous agreement by scientific psychologists that "things that produce new findings" are valuable, while "things that produce new Eric Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17412168482569793996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-90885262508268132552012-10-10T14:33:36.946-04:002012-10-10T14:33:36.946-04:00Really lookin forward to this issue! I hope mansel...Really lookin forward to this issue! I hope mansell's and marken's PCT paper was helpful. The interview with Richard caused quite a debate with Andrew and Sabrina!Manchester Psychiatry Societyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14543449846821330546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-9003719725448211002012-10-08T10:15:54.674-04:002012-10-08T10:15:54.674-04:00Eric - make sure you announce this issue here when...Eric - make sure you announce this issue here when it comes out :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-7597836611693121312012-10-08T09:14:21.227-04:002012-10-08T09:14:21.227-04:00Okay, here are two somewhat distinct thoughts.
(1...Okay, here are two somewhat distinct thoughts.<br /><br />(1) You suggest that your authors could "lead with the positive side of their message" by showing (with examples) "how their approach produces novel findings and/or successful interventions." This suggestion presupposes that the "novel"ty of the findings will be evident even without the kind of framing that Lee Rudolphhttp://www.evolutionaryontology.comnoreply@blogger.com