tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post6971934855067518323..comments2023-12-20T19:30:28.788-05:00Comments on Fixing Psychology: Embodied CognitionEric Charleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17412168482569793996noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-32198552230268847132011-11-11T20:57:15.563-05:002011-11-11T20:57:15.563-05:00Sam,
I'm glad you found my post helpful!
I a...Sam,<br />I'm glad you found my post helpful! <br /><br />I also agree with you about taking a long term view. As embodied cognition folk become better at articulating their views in convincing ways, they can attract the students and younger researchers. What remains is the will to communicate complex ideas to the public, and a war of attrition. <br /><br />I just did a day trip down to the Eric Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17412168482569793996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-92071226701505235392011-11-10T21:41:25.397-05:002011-11-10T21:41:25.397-05:00Eric,
Thank you for fleshing out this line of re...Eric, <br /><br />Thank you for fleshing out this line of reasoning. I think you clarified many of the things I was confused about over at Andrew's blog (not to take away from the value of his post). In particular, providing a bit of historical context made it clear why some folks - mainly the old ones who went to school during the cognitive revolution - seem to be not "fully reject Sam McNerneyhttp://whywereason.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1483944200593561804.post-59417655321588587202011-11-08T03:39:13.602-05:002011-11-08T03:39:13.602-05:00I basically agree with all this. I guess my primar...I basically agree with all this. I guess my primary target was the embodiment Sam was highlighting, like the moving in time paper; hence the distinction. <br /><br />Good luck getting anyone to admit being a tacit dualist, though :)Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16732977871048876430noreply@blogger.com